Diwo
CatalystManufacturingRetail

Procurement Optimization — Purchasing Harmonization Savings

Tuesday afternoon.

Ranked in dollars
·
What-if validation
·
Push to ops
01The Problem

Today’s workflow is the bottleneck.

Tuesday afternoon. Your sourcing lead has three vendor spec PDFs open side-by-side, trying to confirm whether the bracket from Supplier A is functionally the same part as the one Supplier B ships at a different price. Hundreds of vendors. Thousands of near-duplicate SKUs. Every substitution has to clear engineering guidelines, and the documentation lives in manuals nobody reads cover-to-cover. The harmonization savings are sitting right there in the spend file — and they stay there, quarter after quarter, because nobody has the hours to chase them.
The status quo· typical decision cycle
signal decays
  1. Signal captured
    Models score. Data is fresh.
    Day 1
  2. Dashboard built
    Analyst pulls CSVs, joins sources
    Day 2–3
  3. Review meeting
    Stakeholders ask for context, re-pull
    Day 4
  4. Window has closed
    Signal stale, action wasted
    Day 5+
By the time the action is ready, the window has closed.
5 days between signal and action. The data science team did their job. The operator is still waiting.
02The Approach

How Catalyst handles it.

Catalyst doesn't hand your team another spend-analytics dashboard. It ingests every component specification PDF and manual you have, uses a Semantic Knowledge Graph to reconcile nuanced meanings across structured and unstructured sources, and recommends substitutable components that adhere to engineering guidelines. Each recommendation factors in purchasing history, standard PLM parts, cost of parts, and forecasted demand, then continuously learns from the outcomes of prior substitutions. The sourcing lead opens a ranked list of substitutable parts with a cost delta and a guideline check already done — a harmonization decision, not a research project.
Catalyst · Conversation
A
Which components can be substituted across vendors while still meeting specification?
Catalyst · 320ms · sources: 4
Here’s what I found — three drivers explain most of the signal, and I’ve ranked them by impact.
RECOMMENDATION
Take action on the top-ranked driver first.
Expected lift: +11.7% · 4-week window.
See this live

Watch Catalyst solve procurement optimization — purchasing harmonization savings on your manufacturing stack.

45-minute working demo. Your data, your question, a real answer — not a pre-recorded walkthrough.

03Ask

Questions you can ask.

Every case ships with a set of high-leverage prompts — the shortlist operators reach for every week. Here are the ones we see working for procurement optimization — purchasing harmonization savings.
Anchor question
01 · start here
Which components can be substituted across vendors while still meeting specification?
02
Where are the largest purchasing harmonization savings hiding in our current spend?
03
How do purchasing history and forecasted demand change the best substitution choice?
04
Which standard PLM parts should replace redundant vendor-specific SKUs?
05
What is the cost delta between the current part and recommended substitutes?
See it on your data

Bring a real Manufacturing question. We’ll show you the decision.

We’ll run Catalystagainst a slice of your own data during the demo — no slideware, no prerecorded mock. You leave with a working decision and a line of sight to the next one.